A key issue for nationalists is the high levels of immigration, illegal and otherwise. Much of the apologia for allowing the immigration centers around low U.S. birth rates the need for more workers. But importing people who lack the intellectual or cultural wherewithal to successfully integrate into our European (and more specifically Anglo-Saxon) society is a death sentence for the Bill of Rights in the long term. (To be clear, I am calling for an end to all immigration immediately with an emphasis on building a wall at the southern border.) What should be done to ensure the future of our people and a future work force? Increase the birth rate of the native born. I know that natalist policies have been a mixed bag; but I ultimately believe that incentives matter and can work in this area. For example, the high rates of illegal immigration have kept down wages for nannies, and at least one study linked this to higher birth rates of native-born Americans when compared to Europeans.
Tax policy can provide huge incentives for couples to have children. But we want couples who are already successful to have children because they have already demonstrated genetic fitness, and because they have the financial resources to provide for children. I propose a massive increase in the child tax credit that is a percentage of adjusted gross income. The total value of the credit should be in the range of 5% of AGI per child capped at $1 million in income. That means a couple earning $200,000 per year would get a $20,000 credit for two children. That might be too generous, I would need expert help to get the incentive just right. Basing the credit on a percentage of AGI would also encourage couples who already have children to earn more money, which can only help the economy and their kids.
Another key issue is that college bound women waste their peak fertile years in college. However, for the benefit of our society, it is best to educate women to eventually join the work force. In order to increase the birth rate, we need some way to encourage college-aspiring women to have babies starting at 18 but still retain the opportunity for college. This might be remedied by a policy that provides scholarship money to woman who delay the start of college to have children. This policy is intended to have "unintended" consequences. First, I know that many such women who have a child will not want to return to work or college soon. My gut instinct, based on some reading, is that removing more women from the work force and returning them to traditional roles will result in a more traditional and conservative society. Fat young women who have no business being in college, as evidenced by their selection of critical dance theory as a major, are a ready source of "troops" for leftist causes. Further, pregnancy alters the brains of women; I would bet that it does so in ways that make women more amenable to supporting traditional societal norms.
I intend to write more about both natalist and nationalist polices. If you are reading this column by way of twitter, I wrote this for John Rivers, whom I follow. He makes great points, but I keep thinking that more detail is needed to implement national policy that will achieve the results we mutually desire. Just hating the left isn't going to change the trajectory of the nation. Since we are descendants of the people who invented Western civilization and modern industrial society; there's no reason to believe we can't start to figure out how to reverse the current trends in America that put us on a trajectory towards third world dictatorship.
No comments:
Post a Comment