My TrumpNation Guide To San Diego Ballot Propositions.
In a previous post on California ballot measures, I mostly recommended voting NO. I am repeating this same recommendation for local ballot initiatives in San Diego. There is all sorts of disguised skullduggery afoot, as I explain below; so if you don't know, Vote No!
Measure A. 1/2 Cent Sales Tax for SANDAG. NO
They say they will fix potholes with the money; maybe they will maybe they won't. They can spend the extra money however they want within the listed priorities.
Measure B. Lilac Hill Development near Escondido. YES
The developers are having troubles with the seemingly endless regulation needed to build a project of this size. So I say yes, as part of my bid to poke the eye of all regulators.
Measure C. Hotel Tax for Downtown Charger Stadium. NO
Raises the hotel tax to build a stadium downtown for the Chargers. Just say no to professional sports owners getting sweetheart deals from cities.
Measure D. Competing Hotel Tax Measure for Charger Stadium. NO
Supposedly a better deal for taxpayers than Measure C; but my same objection to funding billionaires businesses applies.
Measure E. Removal of City Officials. NO
Provides for removal of "mayor, city attorney and City Council members to forfeit their job outright if they are convicted of a felony, found civilly liable for fraud or declared incapacitated by a court." Source: VOSD. Only voters should remove elected officials. Further, this opens up the door for judicial shenanigans. A friendly judge could declare the mayor "insane" and voila, the City Council President is Mayor.
Measure F. Probation Period for City Attorneys. NO
This measure would decrease the probationary period for city attorneys from 2 years to 1 year. The elected City Attorney needs the right to shape the staff, so no. Plus, if this is a problem it can be a campaign issue. It was one reason I voted for Jan Goldsmith in 2008, because he promised to clean up the managerial practices of the then City Attorney We need to fix issues by electing the right people, which is why I am voting for Trump.
Measure G. More Teeth for Police Oversight. NO
This would give the Citizens Review Board a new name, more power to investigate and issue subpoenas. This might be good if the San Diego police were doing a bad job. But I fear that the police will get hamstrung and crime will rise as a result, like we are seeing in Baltimore, New York, and Chicago.
Measure H. Change to City Contracting Legal Language. NO
Supposedly uncontroversial measure removes requirement to publish advertisement of contracts in local paper, so too bad, NO! Much good work in uncovering corruption has been performed by perusing public documents. Dave Maass is an example of someone who has done such work.
Measure I. Keep San Diego High School in it Current Location. NO
Directs the city to lease a portion of Balboa Park to the school district which would keep San Diego High in its current location. I can't help but think this will also save taxpayer dollars and save the flagship high school.
Measure J. Take More Money out of Mission Bay Rentals. NO
Increases from 25% to 35% the amount of money that the city can shift out of Mission Bay Park to other parks from the rents it produces. Seems unfair to me.
Measure K. November Elections No Matter What Happens in June. NO
Requires a run off for Mayor and other offices even if the winner of the June primary got over 50% of the vote. Since Republicans turn out better during primaries, this favors Democrats. If Democrats want their lazy voters to make a difference, turn them out in June.
Measure L. November Elections for Ballot Measures. NO
Allows certain type of ballot measures to only be voted on in November. Why bother having a June election if it is meaningless?
Measure M. Raise Limits on Affordable Housing City Manages. NO
This would increase the number of units of "affordable housing" the city is allowed to manage. Stop all the regulations that prevent new homes from being built instead.
Measure N. Taxes on Marijuana if Legalized. NO
The only good that would come of legalized weed would be a reduction of violence due to no more black market. This would re-establish the black market and the violence by raising the price of marijuana above street prices. As we have seen in New York City with the death of Eric Garner, cigarette taxes kill.