After Heller and McDonald, we were not surprised to see the Supreme Court taking up Drake v. Jerejian. We don’t believe that the District Attorney should be filing amicus briefs on the issue – like Bonnie Dumanis did in Heller when she filed an amicus brief supporting DC’s (thereafter overturned) ban on keeping firearms in the home for self-defense. We can’t be certain of the ruling or scope of the Court’s review in Drake, and Peruta allowed individuals to have a CCW without “good cause.” Therefore, this is the current state of the law. As District Attorney, Bob Brewer is committed to enforcing the law.That is probably as good as I was going to get from an attorney running for public office. I appreciate that he wouldn't file amicus briefs against 2nd amendment challenges. Certainly the reference to Peruta v County of San Diego is good; still, I was hoping for a more robust defense of the 2nd amendment in the response; but certainly better than Dumanis.
Saturday, May 10, 2014
Update From Bob Brewer Campaign on Handgun Issue
I asked the Bob Brewer for DA campaign what the candidate's position was with regards to Drake v Jerejian, which revolves around requirement by the state of New Jersey that permitted handgun owner show "justifiable need" to be issued a permit to carry in public. I did so because one of my beefs with Bonnie Dumanis during her tenure as DA was signing an amicus brief asking the courts to deny an individual right to bear arms in Heller v District of Columbia. Drake v Jerejian was being considered by the Supreme Court at the time I asked the question, but has the petition to hear the case was subsequently denied. Regardless, here is Bob Brewer's campaign manager's (Alex Roth) response to my query: