data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea4b1/ea4b15e7f9b142165055a07174fe32004f59c70a" alt=""
Meanwhile, I know from first hand knowledge that one of the reasons the sequestration is going to hit the Department of Defense particularly hard is that Obama directed the Department of Defense to spend at last year's level of funding through the first half of this fiscal year. As a result, when a budget cut of 10% has to be executed over half the year, it looks like a more drastic 20% cut. I suspect, but lack the proof, that the President did this for political reasons. First, he did so not to lose votes in places like Virginia. Second, he got the additional benefit of making the cuts to defense appear more draconian because they must be executed over a shorter time frame.
Meanwhile, most of the country is going to yawn at the actual effects of sequestration. There will be pockets of pain in cities with a high concentration of defense civilians, and maybe some longer lines at the airport. I think this works to the advantage of those who want to cut spending because the over-reaction to sequestration will be seen as "crying wolf."
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete